←back to thread

91 points hacknslack | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.528s | source
Show context
userbinator[dead post] ◴[] No.43577548[source]
[flagged]
Analemma_ ◴[] No.43578173[source]
I’ve been hearing for 20 years that any second now Secure Boot be used to block people from installing Linux. It has never happened, not even on Microsoft’s 1st-party hardware. Give it a rest, yeah?
replies(4): >>43578355 #>>43578743 #>>43578871 #>>43580819 #
usr1106 ◴[] No.43578743[source]
There is a deal between antitrust regulators (would need to look up who exactly...) and Microsoft that secure boot on x86 must allow to install your own keys and thereby alternative operating systems. It does not cover any other architecture, so ARM devices can be and have been locked. Just Microsoft is not very relevant in the ARM space so it's less disturbing. (Others are locking ARM, too. But that's a different discussion.)

Also I would not trust on the current US administration to keep deals that limit US corporations in force forever.

I have used secure boot to secure Linux systems, so it is useful for Linux users. But the danger that oligopolists will misuse it is not unreal.

replies(2): >>43578898 #>>43580129 #
1. exe34 ◴[] No.43578898[source]
it's like the antivax - we haven't had an outbreak of $x in $y years, why do we still need to be vaccinated?