←back to thread

305 points todsacerdoti | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.352s | source
Show context
danso ◴[] No.43568982[source]
Sounds like the Switch 2 might be a bit more powerful and similarly priced to the 3-year-old Deck. But even if Switch’s hardware feature set was substantially better, Steam’s much cheaper (and more expansive) library is still the killer feature. I don’t think the Switch 1’s Zelda launch title has ever been discounted lower than $40 despite being 8 years old. On Steam, virtually every top title will be 50% within 2 years, if not 1.
replies(4): >>43569021 #>>43569089 #>>43569224 #>>43569560 #
tossandthrow ◴[] No.43569021[source]
My impression is that the general quality of games on steam is sub par the quality of, eg., Zelda.

Even with a steam deck, I am probably going to get the Switch2, mostly because I can lower my head on in-game profiteering, which is increasingly prevalent on steam games.

replies(8): >>43569252 #>>43569321 #>>43570005 #>>43570477 #>>43571110 #>>43573394 #>>43578292 #>>43584484 #
1. sph ◴[] No.43578292[source]
> My impression is that the general quality of games on steam is sub par the quality of, eg., Zelda.

What? Given that 99.9% of all games are published on Steam, what you are comparing is Zelda against gaming as a whole, not “the quality of games on steam”

Zelda is good, but it’s not better than literally all of gaming. If you are not a die hard Nintendo fan, I’d rather use Steam and enjoy saner pricing. There is always emulation for Nintendo.