←back to thread

446 points walterbell | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.201s | source
Show context
nonrandomstring ◴[] No.43575327[source]
> This isn’t a rant against AI. I use it daily

It is, but it adds disingenuous apologetic.

Not wishing to pick on this particular author, or even this particular topic, but it follows a clear pattern that you can find everywhere in tech journalism:

  Some really bad thing X is happening. Everyone knows X is happening.
  There is evidence X is happening, But I am *not* arguing against X
  because that would brand me a Luddite/outsider/naysayer.... and we
  all know a LOT of money and influence (including my own salary)
  rests on nobody talking about X.
Practically every article on the negative effects of smartphones or social media printed in the past 20 years starts with the same chirpy disavowal of the authors actual message. Something like;

"Smartphones and social media are an essential part of modern life today... but"

That always sounds like those people who say "I'm not a racist, but..."

Sure, we get it, there's a lot of money and powerful people riding on "AI". Why water down your message of genuine concern?

replies(3): >>43576601 #>>43576669 #>>43577160 #
1. Aeolun ◴[] No.43577160[source]
> It is, but it adds disingenuous apologetic.

It’s not. It’s a rant against people and their laziness and gullibility.