←back to thread

AI 2027

(ai-2027.com)
949 points Tenoke | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.267s | source
Show context
torginus ◴[] No.43575836[source]
Much has been made in its article about autonomous agents ability to do research via browsing the web - the web is 90% garbage by weight (including articles on certain specialist topics).

And it shows. When I used GPT's deep research to research the topic, it generated a shallow and largely incorrect summary of the issue, owning mostly to its inability to find quality material, instead it ended up going for places like Wikipedia, and random infomercial listicles found on Google.

I have a trusty Electronics textbook written in the 80s, I'm sure generating a similarly accurate, correct and deep analysis on circuit design using only Google to help would be 1000x harder than sitting down and working through that book and understanding it.

replies(5): >>43576068 #>>43577044 #>>43577133 #>>43581980 #>>43582007 #
1. dimitri-vs ◴[] No.43577133[source]
Interesting, I've hard the exact opposite experience. For example I was curious why in metal casting the top box is called the cope and the bottom is called the drag. And it found very niche information and quotes from page 100 in a PDF on some random government website. The whole report was extremely detailed and verifiable if I followed its links.

That said I suspect (and am already starting to see) the increased use of anti-bot protection to combat browser use agents.