←back to thread

AI 2027

(ai-2027.com)
949 points Tenoke | 1 comments | 03 Apr 25 16:13 UTC | HN request time: 0.303s | source
Show context
superconduct123 ◴[03 Apr 25 21:07 UTC] No.43575419[source]▶
Why are the biggest AI predictions always made by people who aren't deep in the tech side of it? Or actually trying to use the models day-to-day...
replies(8): >>43575588 #>>43575596 #>>43575598 #>>43575759 #>>43575806 #>>43576275 #>>43576313 #>>43579589 #
1. rglover ◴[03 Apr 25 22:33 UTC] No.43576275[source]▶
Aside from the other points about understanding human psychology here, there's also a deep well they're trying to fill inside themselves. That of being someone who can't create things without shepherding others and see AI as the "great equalizer" that will finally let them taste the positive emotions associated with creation.

The funny part, to me, is that it won't. They'll continue to toil and move on to the next huck just as fast as they jumped on this one.

And I say this from observation. Nearly all of the people I've seen pushing AI hyper-sentience are smug about it and, coincidentally, have never built anything on their own (besides a company or organization of others).

Every single one of the rational "we're on the right path but not quite there" takes have been from seasoned engineers who at least have some hands-on experience with the underlying tech.