←back to thread

An image of an archeologist adventurer who wears a hat and uses a bullwhip

(theaiunderwriter.substack.com)
1503 points participant3 | 2 comments | 03 Apr 25 17:55 UTC | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
coderenegade ◴[03 Apr 25 21:10 UTC] No.43575460[source]▶
I don't see why this is an issue? The prompts imply obvious and well-known characters, and don't make it clear that they want an original answer. Most humans would probably give you similar answers if you didn't add an additional qualifier like "not Indiana Jones". The only difference is that a human can't exactly reproduce the likeness of a famous character without significant time and effort.

The real issue here is that there's a whole host of implied context in human languages. On the one hand, we expect the machine to not spit out copyrighted or trademarked material, but on the other hand, there's a whole lot of cultural context and implied context that gets baked into these things during training.

replies(4): >>43575500 #>>43575529 #>>43575609 #>>43575717 #
mvieira38 ◴[03 Apr 25 21:13 UTC] No.43575500[source]▶
It's an IP theft machine. Humans wouldn't be allowed to publish these pictures for profit, but OpenAI is allowed to "generate" them?
replies(5): >>43575542 #>>43575589 #>>43575645 #>>43576071 #>>43576143 #
1. Smithalicious ◴[03 Apr 25 22:18 UTC] No.43576143[source]▶
Won't somebody think of the billionaire IP holders? The horror.
replies(1): >>43576976 #
2. asadotzler ◴[04 Apr 25 00:14 UTC] No.43576976[source]▶
And the small up and coming artists whose work is also stolen, AI-washed, and sold to consumers for a monthly fee, destroying the market for those up and coming artists to sell original works. You don't get to pretend this is only going to hurt big players when there are already small players whose livelihoods have been ruined.