←back to thread

AnimeJs v4 Is Here

(animejs.com)
973 points adrianvoica | 7 comments | | HN request time: 0.337s | source | bottom
Show context
jacobgkau ◴[] No.43572742[source]
Scrolling through that landing page felt a lot smoother & snappier than I would've expected for a page looking like that.
replies(8): >>43572942 #>>43573119 #>>43574072 #>>43574981 #>>43575013 #>>43578231 #>>43579154 #>>43591513 #
ryandrake ◴[] No.43574981[source]
It's clever, but honestly I don't care how smooth it is. Scrolling should simply scroll a view up or down a page. Not invoke animation. We already have established UX patterns for playing media, slowing it down, speeding it up, randomly seeking through it.
replies(6): >>43575007 #>>43575116 #>>43575711 #>>43575864 #>>43575870 #>>43576207 #
1. jonwinstanley ◴[] No.43575864[source]
So what would you suggest to use to move the animation forward?
replies(3): >>43576694 #>>43577235 #>>43585462 #
2. hoc ◴[] No.43576694[source]
That missing Playdate phone accessory.
3. evilduck ◴[] No.43577235[source]
Submitting a form repeatedly by hammering enter and having a new HTML fragment rendered on the server deliver the next frame, obviously.
replies(1): >>43578186 #
4. dalmo3 ◴[] No.43578186[source]
AnimeNoJs
5. throwaway290 ◴[] No.43585462[source]
not use animation in the first place :)
replies(1): >>43593632 #
6. hydrolox ◴[] No.43593632[source]
isn't the point that it's an animation library showcasing what's possible?
replies(1): >>43595037 #
7. throwaway290 ◴[] No.43595037{3}[source]
good point, I read it as about websites in general but in this case why not.