←back to thread

AI 2027

(ai-2027.com)
949 points Tenoke | 1 comments | 03 Apr 25 16:13 UTC | HN request time: 0.201s | source
Show context
beklein ◴[03 Apr 25 17:12 UTC] No.43572674[source]▶
Older and related article from one of the authors titled "What 2026 looks like", that is holding up very well against time. Written in mid 2021 (pre ChatGPT)

https://www.alignmentforum.org/posts/6Xgy6CAf2jqHhynHL/what-...

//edit: remove the referral tags from URL

replies(9): >>43572850 #>>43572964 #>>43573185 #>>43573413 #>>43573523 #>>43575079 #>>43575122 #>>43575183 #>>43575630 #
motoxpro ◴[03 Apr 25 17:36 UTC] No.43572964[source]▶
That's incredible how much it broadly aligns with what has happened. Especially because it was before ChatGPT.
replies(2): >>43573807 #>>43576710 #
reducesuffering ◴[03 Apr 25 18:52 UTC] No.43573807[source]▶
Will people finally wake up that the AGI X-Risk people have been right and we’re rapidly approaching a really fucking big deal?

This forum has been so behind for too long.

Sama has been saying this a decade now: “Development of Superhuman machine intelligence is probably the greatest threat to the continued existence of humanity” 2015 https://blog.samaltman.com/machine-intelligence-part-1

Hinton, Ilya, Dario Amodei, RLHF inventor, Deepmind founders. They all get it, which is why they’re the smart cookies in those positions.

First stage is denial, I get it, not easy to swallow the gravity of what’s coming.

replies(6): >>43574597 #>>43575158 #>>43575632 #>>43575654 #>>43575793 #>>43575851 #
1. pixl97 ◴[03 Apr 25 21:26 UTC] No.43575654[source]▶
>This forum has been so behind for too long.

There is a strong financial incentive for a lot of people on this site to deny they are at risk from it, or to deny what they are building has risk and they should have culpability from that.