←back to thread

218 points pseudolus | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
gweinberg ◴[] No.43571891[source]
It doesn't make sense to me that the piece should start with a 17 month rest. Surely it doesn't really start until the first note is played?
replies(10): >>43572006 #>>43572008 #>>43572024 #>>43572227 #>>43572369 #>>43572631 #>>43572794 #>>43572796 #>>43572956 #>>43573608 #
kbutler ◴[] No.43572008[source]
In a live orchestra performance, the conductor raises his hands. The audience quiets in anticipation.

He gives an up tick indicating the beginning of the music, then the downbeat of the start of the first measure.

No sound is heard.

The conductor continues to mark time. The silence is deep...profound.

The conductor continues to mark the time of the passing measures.

The audience listens.

At some point, positive sound breaks the silence - suddenly, loudly destroying the stillness! Or possibly very nearly silently - at the uncertain threshold of perception, the audible music begins...

replies(1): >>43572127 #
lazystar ◴[] No.43572127[source]
> the audible music begins...

right, so it begins when the music starts playing?

replies(2): >>43572183 #>>43573018 #
throwway120385 ◴[] No.43572183[source]
The experience begins when the conductor starts marking time.
replies(2): >>43572314 #>>43573642 #
1. jacobgkau ◴[] No.43573642[source]
There doesn't seem to be a conductor at all in this performance, and there certainly wasn't one for the entire 17 months that the rest lasted. (The person in charge of this project, Rainer Neugebauer, is not conducting; the linked article makes mention of a speech before the note was changed, but nothing about marking time.)

Not that I'd expect a conductor to be needed for a soloist performance, but it makes the whole "when the conductor raises his hands" point a little off-topic.