←back to thread

218 points pseudolus | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.205s | source
Show context
gweinberg ◴[] No.43571891[source]
It doesn't make sense to me that the piece should start with a 17 month rest. Surely it doesn't really start until the first note is played?
replies(10): >>43572006 #>>43572008 #>>43572024 #>>43572227 #>>43572369 #>>43572631 #>>43572794 #>>43572796 #>>43572956 #>>43573608 #
ssttoo ◴[] No.43572227[source]
Beethoven’s 5th symphony (da-da-da-DAA) starts with a rest too, it’s not unusual to notate like this. Many pieces have “pickup” measures which are not complete and much shorter than a full measure. But when the pickup is more than 50% of a normal measure, it’s no longer much of a pickup and starting with a rest to make up the complete measure makes sense.
replies(1): >>43572331 #
bigstrat2003 ◴[] No.43572331[source]
That's all fine and dandy when you're talking about a genuine piece of music. But for something like this, counting a rest that goes for 17 years is taking it way too far.
replies(4): >>43572452 #>>43572458 #>>43572468 #>>43573155 #
1. itishappy ◴[] No.43572458[source]
Not the 639 year recital?