←back to thread

An open source, self-hosted implementation of the Tailscale control server

(github.com)
345 points quyleanh | 1 comments | 03 Apr 25 00:23 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
mountainriver ◴[03 Apr 25 01:47 UTC] No.43563824[source]▶
Love headscale, we just took it to production and it’s been great
replies(2): >>43563975 #>>43569576 #
1. linsomniac ◴[03 Apr 25 13:47 UTC] No.43569576[source]▶
I've been running headscale for 2.5 years and it's been pretty good. We use our gmail domain for logging in, which gives a big benefit that users can self-serve their devices. Unlike with OpenVPN in the past where ops had to hand off the certs and configs. Really the only downside has been when they accidentally connect to the tailscale login server instead of our own and then can't figure out why they can't reach any services. We use user groups to set up what services users can access.

We are still running the old headscale, because we have some integrations that will need to be ported to the new control plane. According to "headscale node list | wc" we have ~250 nodes, most of them are servers.

One thing I really don't love about tailscale some of the magic it does with the routing tables and adding firewall rules, but it has mostly not been an issue. Tailscale has worked really quite well.