←back to thread

218 points pseudolus | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
jfengel ◴[] No.43548124[source]
This is the same guy who wrote 4'33", the silent piece.

I kinda get that -- the 40000 Hz podcast gave it some good context:

https://podcasts.apple.com/fr/podcast/433-by-john-cage-twent...

Maybe they'll also explain the point of this. The piece is called "As Slow As Possible", but it's not as slow as possible. The slowest possible piece would have a fermata with an infinity sign over the first note, and that's it. Maybe the rest of it would be a jaunty little tune that would never be played in context. ("Shave and a haircut", perhaps?)

As a stunt, it's moderately interesting. How do you set up a contraption to play for hundreds of years? How do you maintain it without interrupting the performance? But it's less interesting than the 10,000 year clock.

replies(9): >>43567319 #>>43567519 #>>43567526 #>>43567964 #>>43568119 #>>43568249 #>>43568363 #>>43570815 #>>43571760 #
1. nkrisc ◴[] No.43567526[source]
> The piece is called "As Slow As Possible", but it's not as slow as possible.

In what way is it “possible” to play an infinitely long piece of music?