←back to thread

49 points geox | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.205s | source
Show context
pinkmuffinere ◴[] No.43564937[source]
> Even on an overcast day, the team saw over 545 watts of solar input

Let’s (generously) assume that was the minimum they saw, and let’s (generously) say they charged for 14 hours. That’s 7.63 kWh gained over the day, in almost ideal conditions. Flagstaff’s high altitude means stronger sunlight, and they can do regenerative braking as they come down the mountain. In my Nissan leaf, 6 kWh would get me about 20 miles. If they are much more efficient, they maybe got 50 miles from the charging on that day, and the other 250 from the charge they started with.

I’d love to be wrong about any of the above! Solar panels on cars would be so cool! It just doesn’t seem useful. Please correct me if I’m mistaken.

replies(7): >>43565024 #>>43565030 #>>43565271 #>>43565284 #>>43565431 #>>43565902 #>>43567545 #
1. milleramp ◴[] No.43565284[source]
Yes also any one with a ev knows speed matters. Its not stated how long it took or average speed over the course. Not to mention a nice draft from the film car. Besides all that I would still love to have one.