←back to thread

An open source, self-hosted implementation of the Tailscale control server

(github.com)
345 points quyleanh | 4 comments | 03 Apr 25 00:23 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
3abiton ◴[03 Apr 25 02:16 UTC] No.43563986[source]▶
This looks interesting! What's the added value over wireguard + openwrt setup?
replies(5): >>43564090 #>>43564133 #>>43564205 #>>43565755 #>>43569621 #
1. usagisushi ◴[03 Apr 25 02:43 UTC] No.43564133[source]▶
It's a mesh VPN, so peers communicate directly without additional delay.

I opted for Netbird myself because Headscale's UI felt too basic for me back then. Has that improved over the years probably?

replies(1): >>43565123 #
2. udev4096 ◴[03 Apr 25 05:30 UTC] No.43565123[source]▶
How is netbird? Is it more stable than tailscale/headscale? How is your performance while streaming a video?
replies(2): >>43567943 #>>43576253 #
3. usagisushi ◴[03 Apr 25 11:15 UTC] No.43567943[source]▶
They are both based on WireGuard (kernel-space and user-space `wireguard-go`), so I guess there's no significant difference in performance for typical usage.

In terms of stability, Netbird has been pretty good for me. I've been using Netbird as the backhaul network for my laptop, phone and inter-site k3s cluster for several years without major issues.

One major downside of Netbird is that its Android client can be quite a battery drainer [1]. (It keeps your fingers warm during winter, though!) As for Tailscale, it offers some neat features like Funnel, which is missing in Netbird, but in my case, covered by DNS and k8s Ingress.

[1]: https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird/pull/3379

4. avtar ◴[03 Apr 25 22:30 UTC] No.43576253[source]▶
Netbird seems (or perhaps is?) newer. It didn't have some basic features baked in when I last looked into it, e.g. you couldn't switch accounts on the client https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird/issues/3273 and if I had an account associated with a single team, then that account couldn't be invited to or be associated with additional teams.