←back to thread

295 points mdhb | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.397s | source
Show context
lenerdenator ◴[] No.43561132[source]
Any time you read anything having to do with this administration, remember:

The behavior will continue until an effective negative stimulus is given.

Then immediately stop reading. The details don't matter at this point.

replies(6): >>43561154 #>>43561678 #>>43562099 #>>43562191 #>>43562255 #>>43562364 #
jfengel ◴[] No.43561154[source]
It has to be a stimulus they feel as negative.

Losing office is about the only unarguable one. Barring a coup, that isn't happening any time soon.

Practically any other stimulus will be perceived as positive.

replies(4): >>43561312 #>>43561317 #>>43561401 #>>43562319 #
mmooss ◴[] No.43561401[source]
High-aggression is a negotiating tactic with basic goals - to intimidate the other side into thinking you are implacable, and to make you seem unstoppable.

It's a tactic. Like everyone else, they have interests and goals and needs, and they can be deterred in the same way. The problem is, nobody really tries. The Democrats keep doing the same ineffective things - a demonstration of being cowed and intimidated.

For example, the Dems have almost no ability to communicate with the public. Whatever Trump and the GOP say are effectively true because there is no counter voice (beyond some third parties). The Dems don't do anything about it; they just keep communicating in the same way.

The Dems have no talking points. A few of them are organizing now around 'economic populism' - in other words, they are completely cowed and will avoid all the major threats to freedom, democracy, the rule of law, safety; the corruption, cruelty, and hate. They are going to their safe space - economic policy!

replies(4): >>43561672 #>>43561707 #>>43561774 #>>43561846 #
jfengel ◴[] No.43561846[source]
I can't imagine what kind of talking points one needs to offer past "uh, we aren't criminals and we're not incompetent".

If the response is "yeah, we're good with those things, what else have you got?" I don't know what to say. You want bread? Maybe some circuses?

The Democrats did have plenty of policies. Realistic ones. Not the most exciting. If the public wants to be excited, and aren't picky about it, then indeed they should have that. But I'm not going to be able to provide it.

replies(4): >>43561947 #>>43561982 #>>43562229 #>>43562283 #
1. scarface_74 ◴[] No.43562229[source]
The Democrats also tried to fool the American public like “Weekend with Bernie’s” and prop Biden up for way too long and couldn’t have a proper primary. Harris couldn’t distance herself from Biden.
replies(1): >>43562812 #
2. mmooss ◴[] No.43562812[source]
It wasn't just the lack of a primary: They just look like losers. They were going all in on a losing candidate and didn't seem to care. It's bizarre.

Many Dem leaders don't seem to care now, complaining that people are pressuring them to be effective.