←back to thread

295 points mdhb | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.25s | source
Show context
bsimpson ◴[] No.43560742[source]
One nice side effect of Signal's importance for governmental/military use is that it helps keep it free for civilian use. They can't mandate a backdoor for something other parts of the government rely on to be secure.

I once heard a great anecdote to that effect, and to my embarrassment I can't recall the details to repeat here.

(And yes, I understand that there are limits on what is appropriate to share with civilian hardware on a civilian network, but the truth stands that part of the reason there's not a push to breach encryption in the US like there is in the UK is because Signal is relied upon even by the government when they need a private channel on civilian hardware.)

replies(9): >>43560773 #>>43560780 #>>43560782 #>>43560939 #>>43560995 #>>43561150 #>>43561233 #>>43561254 #>>43561325 #
1. overfeed ◴[] No.43561325[source]
> They can't mandate a backdoor for something other parts of the government rely on to be secure

Has the NSA moved on from the NOBUS ("NObody But US") doctrine? Empirically, they have been more than happy to keep any vulnerability (or backdoor) available if they believe only they can exploit it.