←back to thread

370 points adriangrigore | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
mfro ◴[] No.43558049[source]
Russ Cox is an absolute legend for committing to this joke.
replies(1): >>43558993 #
pbohun ◴[] No.43558993[source]
Someone needs to convince Russ that it would be hilarious to have a full featured web browser in Plan 9.
replies(4): >>43559051 #>>43559200 #>>43559688 #>>43560785 #
MisterTea ◴[] No.43559688[source]
On 9 front there's vmx which is hardware virtualization. You can boot a Linux kernel with an nfs root from the local machine and use headless vnc to run a browser in a vnc client window.

I'd also like to point out that most users of Plan 9 dislike web technology because it's a giant nightmare of code. No one human can even begin to comprehend the code base of Chrome, let alone Firefox - programs that are as big, if not bigger than the kernels they run on. That is an absurd state to be in - your runtime requires a billion dollar company to maintain. Even open source Firefox needs millions in funding.

Whereas a single human can grasp plan 9 code from the kernel to user space. That's the runtime I want, something I can understand. The process is the container on plan 9 so you have everything you need to build distributed apps without a web browser. It's human scale distributed computing. I'd like a future without the "modern" corporate scale web.

replies(3): >>43560006 #>>43560805 #>>43564290 #
1. facile3232 ◴[] No.43560805[source]
> You can boot a Linux kernel with an nfs root from the local machine and use headless vnc to run a browser in a vnc client window.

Not only is the VNC redirection unnecessary, so it is the entire filesystem. You could just render the vm directly to the window and boot a read only image. Plus then you don't have to deal with VNC.