←back to thread

Why is the world losing color?

(www.culture-critic.com)
322 points trevin | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
crazygringo ◴[] No.43558560[source]
It's not "losing" color.

At periods when technology resulted in new color possibilities, people went overboard with color. Make all the things colorful!! Think of the technicolor sixties. And we can go back in history and see the same thing with new clothing pigments, new paint pigments.

But when everything is colorful, nothing stands out. Everything being colorful is as monotonous as everything being, well, monotone.

Modern taste is more about more neutral-colored foundations with color accents. Don't paint a whole room green -- have a gorgeous green plant that stands out all the more against its neutral background. Don't paint a whole wall orange -- have a beautiful orange-hued piece of art on the wall. It's just more tasteful to use color as one element, along with size, shape, texture, and so forth. Making it the main element in everything is just overdoing it. It's bad design.

I don't want constant "riotous color", as the article puts it, in my home, or my workplace, or while I'm driving. It's visually exhausting.

replies(33): >>43558639 #>>43558663 #>>43558702 #>>43558778 #>>43558896 #>>43558911 #>>43559067 #>>43559157 #>>43559220 #>>43559250 #>>43559287 #>>43559328 #>>43559457 #>>43559575 #>>43559624 #>>43559661 #>>43559810 #>>43559852 #>>43560181 #>>43561036 #>>43561732 #>>43562192 #>>43562292 #>>43562538 #>>43562892 #>>43562989 #>>43563047 #>>43563496 #>>43563563 #>>43563946 #>>43565177 #>>43571894 #>>43572804 #
parpfish ◴[] No.43559157[source]
> I don't want constant "riotous color", as the article puts it, in my home, or my workplace, or while I'm driving. It's visually exhausting.

could a factor driving current monotone style be less about aesthetics and taste and more that we're all just cognitively exhausted?

everything is fighting for our attention because our attention has been monetized. so when something bland shows up, it simultaneously provides a bit of respite and can seem more 'trustworthy' because it isn't clamoring for your attention.

if i were buying some kitchen appliances and i had a choice between a brightly colored models or a stark, utilitarian models, i have to admit that the stark ones have appeal because they "look professional" (even though it may not actually be pro quality) and "the color is just a sales gimmick" (even though boring industrial grey is also a sales gimmick)

replies(3): >>43559291 #>>43560596 #>>43561351 #
1. euroderf ◴[] No.43559291[source]
> we're all just cognitively exhausted?

If you include electronic media as a source of this cognitive exhaustion, then I'm with you. If greyscale dominates the physical environment, then it's a reaction to something equally pervasive.

replies(1): >>43561962 #
2. 9rx ◴[] No.43561962[source]
> If greyscale dominates the physical environment, then it's a reaction to something equally pervasive.

My impression from the data is not that greyscale now dominates the physical environment, but that browns once dominated. Presumably because things like wood, copper, etc. once dominated the materials we engrossed ourselves in. As we've expanded the paints and other materials we live with, we've found much more balance.

replies(1): >>43562457 #
3. bluGill ◴[] No.43562457[source]
Is that really true or isiit just that blues and greens biodegrade and so the only evidence of the past's colors we have is the mineral colors. We have evidence that paint has been used on wood furniture - but not what color was used.
replies(1): >>43562573 #
4. 9rx ◴[] No.43562573{3}[source]
It is true that it is my impression of the data. A different dataset could possibly give me a different impression, but without that dataset...