←back to thread

105 points jfantl | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
jgord ◴[] No.43553018[source]
Just as we have weather forecasting, climate models .. we do need and should have good fine-grain computational models of complex systems such as the cell .. and the global economy.

We should be able to have whole economy simulations give reasonable predictions in response to natural events and lever-pulling such as :

- higher progressive tax rates - central bank interest rate moves - local tariffs and sanctions - shipping blackades / blockages - regional war - extreme weather events - earthquake - regional epidemic - giving poor people cash grants - free higher education - science research grants - skilled immigration / emigration

But .. of course this would require something like a rich country providing grants to applied cross disciplinary research over many years.

It might even lead to insights that prevent semi-regular economic boom and bust cycles we experienced the past 100 years.

replies(8): >>43553072 #>>43553139 #>>43553218 #>>43553240 #>>43553574 #>>43553741 #>>43554470 #>>43562815 #
mym1990 ◴[] No.43553574[source]
While your last point is certainly an ideal to aspire to, something tells me that the powers that be would not actually want to get rid of booms and busts, because ultimately that is where a lot of the “wealth” for those high up is created. You don’t really need complex models to solve the problem of some humans being really, really greedy, driving markets to overheat, ending in catastrophic failure.
replies(1): >>43559039 #
1. sdwr ◴[] No.43559039[source]
Booms and busts emerge naturally from market dynamics, even when everyone is acting fairly and reasonably. You don't need to add sneaky, greedy people pulling the strings from behind a curtain.