←back to thread

633 points jihadjihad | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
ajross ◴[] No.43558061[source]
I tend to wonder if stuff like this is an informative boundary on AI capabilities. I mean, you can't ask a LLM today to do that (AFAICT). "Here's a simply-specified but extremely broad search space, solve this problem in it" isn't something that fits the model. But it's a relatively common (if not "easy") task human beings like to show off.

What needs to change to enable this kind of exploration?

replies(3): >>43558184 #>>43558276 #>>43558387 #
JohnKemeny ◴[] No.43558184[source]
Is it impossible, in this day and age, to enjoy a post without thinking about LLMs? It's like an obsession.
replies(4): >>43558348 #>>43558358 #>>43558412 #>>43559105 #
generationP ◴[] No.43558348[source]
Nope, but this post is such a neat illustration of the richness of "life" that fits into 39 real parameters (each circle can be coordinatized as 3 real numbers: one for its radius and two for its center) that my first thought on seeing it was also "no surprise then that a matrix with a million entries can talk like an erudite person".
replies(2): >>43558578 #>>43558599 #
floxy ◴[] No.43558578[source]
Wouldn't you also need a two parameters for the arc starting position and stopping position for each circle, and then a few more to identify the areas that need to be filled, along with the color?
replies(1): >>43558834 #
1. laurentlb ◴[] No.43558834{3}[source]
Once you've drawn the circles, I think you just need to specify which regions are filled.

Arcs are just intersection of circles, so they are implicit, as far as I can tell.