←back to thread

633 points jihadjihad | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
ajross ◴[] No.43558061[source]
I tend to wonder if stuff like this is an informative boundary on AI capabilities. I mean, you can't ask a LLM today to do that (AFAICT). "Here's a simply-specified but extremely broad search space, solve this problem in it" isn't something that fits the model. But it's a relatively common (if not "easy") task human beings like to show off.

What needs to change to enable this kind of exploration?

replies(3): >>43558184 #>>43558276 #>>43558387 #
JohnKemeny ◴[] No.43558184[source]
Is it impossible, in this day and age, to enjoy a post without thinking about LLMs? It's like an obsession.
replies(4): >>43558348 #>>43558358 #>>43558412 #>>43559105 #
1. elpocko ◴[] No.43558412[source]
Yes, it is impossible. People will think about things they find interesting regardless of your (dis-)approval. Who are you even calling "obsessive?" The collective of people who dare to mention algorithms you don't like? I mean, what the fuck?
replies(1): >>43558797 #
2. albedoa ◴[] No.43558797[source]
Calm down dude, for fuck's sake. Read yourself back.