←back to thread

170 points derbOac | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.197s | source
Show context
ndsipa_pomu ◴[] No.43557060[source]
What puzzles me about the reported birth of coffee is that I wouldn't expect that just eating the cherries would give you that much of a caffeine kick to be noticeable. Yes, there's a little bit of caffeine in them, but far more in the "beans" (seeds).
replies(5): >>43557088 #>>43557345 #>>43557355 #>>43557590 #>>43560669 #
zdragnar ◴[] No.43557345[source]
Tea also has noticeably less caffeine than coffee, yet it has been treated as an energizing drink since it was first discovered.

When you don't have any adrenal stimulants in your diet at all, even a small amount is noticable.

Caffeine also has a metabolic half life of roughly 5 hours in the body, if I remember correctly. A few berries might not do much, but surely a handful will be enough.

replies(3): >>43557429 #>>43557493 #>>43557676 #
jessekv ◴[] No.43557429[source]
Tea leaves usually have more caffeine than coffee beans, but tea itself is usually more diluted than coffee.

If you want a jolt, make a matcha shot with the same mass of matcha as you would normally do for coffee ;)

replies(1): >>43557496 #
fashion-at-cost ◴[] No.43557496[source]
Or a traditional Maté
replies(1): >>43558244 #
1. rwyinuse ◴[] No.43558244[source]
Somehow caffeine from Maté feels different though. To me coffee gives a fast spike and then comedown, while Maté's effect is more balanced, and lasts longer. And I don't think it's just caffeine content, because tea is nothing like that for me.

For staying productive for hours, nothing beats Maté for me (except stimulant medication).