←back to thread

Glubux's Powerwall (2016)

(secondlifestorage.com)
386 points bentobean | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
ianferrel ◴[] No.43549073[source]
>the solution came with rearranging and adjusting the cells to ensure the packs worked more efficiently.

>Glubux even began disassembling entire laptop batteries, removing individual cells and organizing them into custom racks. This task, which likely required a great deal of manual labor and technical knowledge, was key to making the system work effectively and sustainably.

This kind of thing is cool as a passion project, but it really just highlights how efficient the modern supply chain is. If you have the skills of a professional electrician, you too can spend hundreds of hours building a home battery system you could just buy for $20k, but is less reliable.

replies(6): >>43549197 #>>43549208 #>>43550703 #>>43551134 #>>43551753 #>>43562271 #
supportengineer ◴[] No.43549197[source]
There HAS to be a way to automate this process and make it work at scale.
replies(11): >>43549383 #>>43549397 #>>43549447 #>>43549497 #>>43549521 #>>43549609 #>>43549625 #>>43549952 #>>43550129 #>>43550429 #>>43551649 #
joshvm ◴[] No.43549397[source]
You would be amazed how many battery packs are multiple 18650s in a trenchcoat. Even EV battery packs use them. Though it does raise the question - wouldn't an old EV battery be a better solution than stripping apart laptops?
replies(6): >>43549465 #>>43549535 #>>43549883 #>>43550510 #>>43550616 #>>43550707 #
Workaccount2 ◴[] No.43549535[source]
>You would be amazed how many battery packs are multiple 18650s in a trenchcoat

$50 of 18650s in a $500 trenchcoat with DRM protection. So wasteful.

replies(2): >>43549843 #>>43549908 #
0_____0 ◴[] No.43549908[source]
When battery packs that have a non-zero chance of literally killing your users are commonplace, it actually does make sense to vendor-lock the battery. Believe it or not there is actual engineering that goes into making batteries beyond spot welding them to an interconnect and stuffing them into $.50 of ABS enclosure.
replies(2): >>43550624 #>>43550638 #
Workaccount2 ◴[] No.43550624[source]
The "actual engineering" you are referring to is a $1.00 BMS board.

We are well past the point where we should have standardized batteries. We have bunch of standardized wall outlets that accommodate an array of "non-zero chance of literally killing your users" end products. No reason for battery packs to not be standardized (other than vendor lock in).

replies(1): >>43552482 #
0_____0 ◴[] No.43552482[source]
I'm sorry but you're dead wrong about the BMS. BMS doesn't address any of the things I listed.

You're also wrong about standardization - standarization at the cell form factor level is correct. Different applications have different capacity vs power density requirements, temperature range requirements, cost, lifecycle... a pouch cell that goes in a drone looks a lot like one that goes in a cell phone but they're optimized for completely different workloads.

Also we already have standardized interfaces for external batteries with most power banks using USB-C, so in a way your wish has already come true.

replies(1): >>43556899 #
1. Workaccount2 ◴[] No.43556899[source]
Ironically this news dropped yesterday while we were having this discussion

https://www.protoolreviews.com/doge-mandates-power-tool-manu...

Probably the only thing I can agree with doge on.