←back to thread

256 points MattSayar | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.295s | source
Show context
fastball ◴[] No.43541881[source]
The tech is cool, but it seems like the main result of having such a pipeline is that Netflix has been able to produce an incredible amount of low-effort schlock that mostly lacks soul and artistic merit.
replies(13): >>43541976 #>>43541991 #>>43542002 #>>43542079 #>>43542092 #>>43542184 #>>43542186 #>>43542269 #>>43542273 #>>43542285 #>>43542379 #>>43542610 #>>43544360 #
pests ◴[] No.43541976[source]
I remember reading once how all Netflix content is really meant for phones or smaller screens. Simple shots, not much background detail, lots of face closeups etc.

I remember when being made by Netflix was a unique and cool thing, it didn’t last long until it meant probably-slop.

replies(1): >>43542005 #
ksynwa ◴[] No.43542005[source]
A lot of them are also meant to "second screen worthy" where they run in the background while your attention is mainly focused on some other task like playing a video game.
replies(2): >>43543511 #>>43554568 #
1. nthingtohide ◴[] No.43554568[source]
the importance of picking a fight you'll never win

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h-vWRLGnTGg

A filmmaker discusses their experience with Amazon, who bought the rights to their movie and decided to release it on their streaming service instead of in theaters. The filmmaker explains why they feel this is unfair and why they are fighting for their movie to be seen on the big screen.