←back to thread

302 points cf100clunk | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.349s | source
Show context
jparishy ◴[] No.43536564[source]
I think it's quite cool (disclaimer: I am indeed a dirty Yankees fan)

Hitting is really hard. If you feel up to it, and can find a public batting cage near you that has a fast pitch machine (usually maxes out 75-85mph which is 20+ mph less than your typical MLB fastball), give it a shot. When you hit the ball away from the sweet spot, especially on the parts closer to your hands, it really freaking hurts and throws off subsequent swings.

If the few players who are using this bat tend to hit that spot naturally, it makes a lot of sense to modify the bat to accommodate it, within the rules like they've done here. Hitting is super, super difficult especially today with how far we're pushing pitchers. Love seeing them try to innovate.

Plus, reminder, most of the team isn't using it. Judge clobbered the ball that day with his normal bat. Brewer's pitching is injured, and the starter that day was a Yankee last year and the team is intimately familiar with his game.

replies(13): >>43536733 #>>43537013 #>>43538820 #>>43538935 #>>43539111 #>>43539767 #>>43540222 #>>43540288 #>>43540397 #>>43541756 #>>43541894 #>>43542261 #>>43546096 #
scoofy ◴[] No.43540397[source]
I play golf. I write about golf. I genuinely love golf. Over the last 50 years, we have slowly broken the game of golf by allowing incremental technological advancements -- just like this -- that make it easier to do something that is hard, that is making it easier to hit the sweet spot.

I am sending a grave warning to baseball fans here from the future that you will arrive at by following this road.

Golf used to be a finesse game with moments of power. Now everyone is swinging out of their shoes on every shot, and the strategy of the game has reached Nash equilibrium where you basically want to hit the ball as hard as you can at every opportunity, despite any strategic element on the course.

Professional baseball is always what I point to when I talk about what we've lost. You don't need the most optimized equipment to enjoy the game, in fact, ultimately, you don't even want it. Just use simply, standardized equipment, accept the limitations of that equipment, and enjoy a simple game, where strategy can be used to overcome the limitations of equipment. The best thing that the MLB ever did was reject aluminum bats.

replies(26): >>43540447 #>>43540549 #>>43540582 #>>43540648 #>>43540740 #>>43541012 #>>43541100 #>>43541312 #>>43541369 #>>43541592 #>>43541599 #>>43541683 #>>43541721 #>>43541955 #>>43542112 #>>43542311 #>>43542777 #>>43542802 #>>43543587 #>>43544525 #>>43545491 #>>43545616 #>>43546400 #>>43546419 #>>43550521 #>>43558620 #
szvsw ◴[] No.43540582[source]
There’s some consensus though that currently, pitching has evolved much faster than batting due to advances like Trackman and deeper understanding of the relationship between biomechanics, pitch tunneling, spinrate/flight path/movement, and so on. In conjunction with that has been a shift towards “TTO” (three true outcomes - HR/BB/K) on the offensive side, which is a statistically motivated perspective that batting for average is suboptimal. In short, you would rather have a lower BA and a higher home run rate even if it means a higher K rate, since home runs (and 2Bs) are so significantly more valuable than singles, and fly outs are also much more valuable than ground outs (or really, less bad) due to the opportunities for sac flies and the risk of double plays. TTO tho is also partly a response to the elevated pitching capabilities - velocity and spin.

This is all just to say that batters are falling behind and there’s an argument that it hurts the on-field product from an entertainment perspective since balls in play are what we ultimately watch for - if torpedo bats make it more likely that players can bat for higher averages by barreling up the ball more consistently, it will be good for the game.

Other alternative proposals include lowering the mound (famously done in the 60s), adjusting the ball (eg lower seams, which makes it harder for pitchers to generate spin and makes the same spin rates less effective), and so on.

One good (bad?) thing is that to some extent pitchers are starting to reach a biomechanical wall, evidenced by the greatly increased rates of Tommy John surgery, though that is partly also an effect of better surgical techniques and recovery times.

Point is - it’s complicated.

replies(3): >>43540685 #>>43543514 #>>43543812 #
DidYaWipe ◴[] No.43543514[source]
Home runs are not "balls in play," though. So are we to go to a binary game, which amounts to whiffs or homers?

Also I don't think your assertion that batters have "fallen behind" pitchers holds up. Shohei Ohtani just became the first player to have 50 homers and 50 stolen bases.

replies(2): >>43543749 #>>43545521 #
TylerE ◴[] No.43543749[source]
The stolen base thing is such a canard. The rules changes made stealing massively easier. He probably wouldn’t have stolen 30 under the old rules.
replies(1): >>43553120 #
1. DidYaWipe ◴[] No.43553120[source]
Fair enough, but 50 homers is still pretty good.