←back to thread

196 points generichuman | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
jll29 ◴[] No.43552855[source]

  > More importantly, separating the dynamic linker from the C library itself would allow multiple versions of libc to coexist, eliminating a major source of compatibility issues. This is exactly how Windows handles it, which is one of the reasons Windows maintains such strong binary compatibility. You can still run decades-old Windows software today because Microsoft doesn’t force everything to be tied to a single, ever-changing libc.
One of the questions of multiple versions on the same box is what about security issues of those older versions...
replies(2): >>43552867 #>>43553174 #
1. moron4hire ◴[] No.43552867[source]
What about the security issues of the old operating systems people keep around for their mission critical software that has no upgrade path?
replies(1): >>43553053 #
2. pmarreck ◴[] No.43553053[source]
isn't this tu quoque?