←back to thread

511 points goldenskye | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
busyant ◴[] No.43545713[source]
I worked at a biotech startup about 20 years ago.

- Two of the VPs at the company were named Jim Collinsworth and Peter Sachs (not their real names).

- For reasons I can't remember, I was able to send emails through the company's Windows email server under any name that I wanted.

- So, I merged the two VP names and I sent an email blast to the entire company from "Peter Collinsworth" (just swapping first and last names).

- "Peter" Collinsworth's email said something to the effect of "In honor of the 765th anniversary of the establishment of the Exchequer and the signing of the Magna Carta, <biotech-startup-x> is declaring April as 'English Unit' Celebration Month. All laboratory generated results will be reported using the following units: Instead of mg/kg/day, we will use pounds/stone/fortnight ...." etc. etc. etc.

- Well, Jim Collinsworth (real VP) saw the email and even he thought that the email had been sent under his own name.

- So, Jim fired off an email blast saying, "I did NOT send this. I don't know what this is about."

- Everyone soon realized it was an April Fool's joke.

- Jim eventually made his way to my office to say ... "That was really funny. Don't EVER do it again."

replies(4): >>43545738 #>>43545867 #>>43546504 #>>43568760 #
LinuxBender ◴[] No.43545867[source]
For reasons I can't remember, I was able to send emails through the company's Windows email server under any name that I wanted.

I know of several fortune 100 companies that still allow this due to the way they set up email protection with o365 and Proofpoint, ironically. not naming them. I've done similar pranks and got by with the skin of my teeth but would not recommend people do this early in their career especially if leadership are sensitive to embarrassment.

replies(3): >>43546087 #>>43546494 #>>43547445 #
dennis_jeeves2 ◴[] No.43546494[source]
>leadership are sensitive to embarrassment

Or they don't want distractions that are too costly.

replies(1): >>43552793 #
1. LinuxBender ◴[] No.43552793[source]
To your point the incident I described took several windows admins a while to find the USB prank. They thought we had a live extortion hack in progress and that was about the time they called me into it.