←back to thread

Experimental Tauri Verso Integration

(v2.tauri.app)
142 points stareatgoats | 1 comments | 29 Mar 25 20:30 UTC | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
shubhamjain ◴[01 Apr 25 11:02 UTC] No.43545314[source]▶
I’m a bit confused. I thought the main selling point of Tauri was that it uses the OS’s native WebView to create lighter apps compared to something like Electron. So why would I want to bundle a Servo or Verso? Doesn't that defeat the purpose of Tauri?
replies(8): >>43545331 #>>43545426 #>>43545891 #>>43546249 #>>43546256 #>>43546875 #>>43548611 #>>43551775 #
dist-epoch ◴[01 Apr 25 12:22 UTC] No.43545891[source]▶
> I thought the main selling point of Tauri was that it uses the OS’s native WebView to create lighter apps compared to something like Electron

It was a talking point for angry at clouds people.

It was never a selling point, because nobody cares how big apps are today. For a regular user with a 256/512 GB drive, even if they had 50 electron apps 1 GB each, it would not matter in the grand scheme of things.

replies(1): >>43545943 #
synergy20 ◴[01 Apr 25 12:28 UTC] No.43545943[source]▶
well,what about memory usage. storage is cheap indeed, but memory is limited still
replies(1): >>43546010 #
dist-epoch ◴[01 Apr 25 12:34 UTC] No.43546010[source]▶
From the 1 GB a typical Electron app uses, only about 300 MB are binaries which might be shared if they were a WebView.

So yes, using a WebView might decrease your memory usage by 30%, maybe 50% for small apps. Not a huge game changer, maybe it would make a 8 GB RAM laptop more usable.

replies(3): >>43546097 #>>43546212 #>>43551777 #
1. kbelder ◴[01 Apr 25 21:59 UTC] No.43551777[source]▶
The big gain is from replacing a 1 GB Electron app with a 50 MB native app. Tauri is an improvement, but not a transformative one.