←back to thread

Glubux's Powerwall (2016)

(secondlifestorage.com)
386 points bentobean | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
Kaytaro ◴[] No.43550650[source]
The 2nd quote is when I realized this article was written or assisted by AI. Not that it's a big deal, that's our world now. But it's interesting to notice the subtle 'accent' that gives it away.
replies(5): >>43550687 #>>43550692 #>>43550882 #>>43551747 #>>43552109 #
dartos ◴[] No.43550687[source]
What about it gives off the AI smell to you?
replies(3): >>43550700 #>>43551005 #>>43551290 #
endtime ◴[] No.43550700[source]
Nice try, ChatGPT.

More seriously, for me it's the "likely".

replies(1): >>43550717 #
ziddoap ◴[] No.43550717[source]
Using "likely" is indicative of AI now...?

Absurd.

The only thing as annoying as people using AI and passing it off as their own writing is the people who claim everything written not exactly how they are used to is AI.

replies(3): >>43550793 #>>43551020 #>>43551062 #
1. hn_throwaway_99 ◴[] No.43551020{3}[source]
But using "likely" is obviously AI in this context, or at least it's really, really shitty reporting.

This is supposed to be a news article, not someone who's hypothesizing about something that could have been. I mean, it either required a great deal of manual labor and technical knowledge or it didn't - no guessing should be required. If the author doesn't know, they can do proper research or simply ask the subject.

FWIW this article didn't immediately scream AI to me either, until the commenter pointed out the use of "likely". When you think about it, it absolutely becomes a fingerprint of AI in this context - it's not just that "likely" anywhere means it's AI.