(batsov.com)

438 points bozhidar | 2 comments | 01 Apr 25 12:34 UTC | HN request time: 0.439s | source

Show context

gwbas1c ◴[01 Apr 25 13:34 UTC] No.43546618[source]▶

> Why F#?

I'm kinda wondering if anyone here with decent C#/.net experience can give their version of the answer?

---

The article really didn't answer its own question. It basically says "How" instead of "Why"...

...Which as someone who's spent over 20 years in C#, and tends to advocate for "functional" style, leaves me with more questions than answers!

malakai521 ◴[01 Apr 25 15:52 UTC] No.43548267[source]▶

A nicer, cleaner and simpler syntax, superior pattern matching, active patterns, discriminated unions and computation expressions

replies(1): >>43549041 #

1. int_19h ◴[01 Apr 25 16:58 UTC] No.43549041[source]▶

C# has the equivalent of active patterns these days.

replies(1): >>43550425 #

2. malakai521 ◴[01 Apr 25 19:21 UTC] No.43550425[source]▶

It does not