←back to thread

352 points instagraham | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.405s | source
Show context
keyle ◴[] No.43533500[source]
Potentially a very dumb question, but seeing the difference between cyclones and hurricane on earth (clock-wise, anti-clock-wise)...

Does it mean that we are, potentially, on one of two poles(?) of the observable universe, if we're observing most galaxies around us rotating a certain way?

replies(14): >>43533840 #>>43533853 #>>43533969 #>>43533992 #>>43534000 #>>43534001 #>>43534401 #>>43534594 #>>43535729 #>>43537965 #>>43538321 #>>43539059 #>>43539378 #>>43539557 #
tiffanyh ◴[] No.43534000[source]
My own dumb question …

How does cyclones/hurricanes relate to being “on one of two ‘poles’”?

Do you mean hemisphere?

replies(1): >>43534491 #
jeffdn ◴[] No.43534491[source]
If all of the galaxies we see rotate the same way, are we “looking down” from a pole and seeing only those with the same rotation we have, as opposed to a more equatorial view that would be evenly split.
replies(1): >>43535156 #
vlovich123 ◴[] No.43535156[source]
But the universe isn’t spherical. I’m not sure I understand this hypothesis as explained.
replies(3): >>43535326 #>>43535422 #>>43535431 #
x3n0ph3n3 ◴[] No.43535431[source]
How do you know?
replies(1): >>43542105 #
paulrouget ◴[] No.43542105[source]
Because measurements confirm a homogeneous and isotopic universe. A spherical universe would imply a special point, the center, which would go against these cosmological principals.
replies(2): >>43547265 #>>43563382 #
1. vlovich123 ◴[] No.43547265[source]
Could be a universe that folds in on itself in multidimensional space so that every point looks like the center. But it almost certainly isn’t a 3d sphere.