←back to thread

The case against conversational interfaces

(julian.digital)
279 points nnx | 1 comments | 01 Apr 25 02:14 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
android521 ◴[01 Apr 25 06:57 UTC] No.43543654[source]▶
>I admit that the title of this essay is a bit misleading (made you click though, didn’t it?). This isn’t really a case against conversational interfaces, it’s a case against zero-sum thinking.

No matter the intention or quality of the article, i do not like this kind of deceitful link-bait article. It may have higher quality than pure link-bait but nobody like to be deceived

replies(2): >>43545350 #>>43546794 #
1. johnnyanmac ◴[01 Apr 25 11:09 UTC] No.43545350[source]▶
I simply saw that as tongue in cheek about how the author wanted to use a more general core point. The lens of conversational interfaces makes a good case for that while keeping true to the idea.

You can argue against something but also not think it's 100% useless.