←back to thread

224 points croes | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.002s | source
Show context
Terr_ ◴[] No.43544712[source]
> The Trump administration argues that because the man is no longer in U.S. custody, a U.S. court lacks jurisdiction to issue orders regarding his detention and release.

That's evil and stupid.

By that twisted logic, the President can ship all the gold in Fort Knox to a Russian bank under his own name, and US courts "won't have jurisdiction" to rule that it must be returned.

replies(4): >>43544801 #>>43544837 #>>43544921 #>>43552860 #
mcv ◴[] No.43544801[source]
That's also how the US used to justify torture in Guantanamo Bay. It wasn't US soil, so the prisoners there didn't have the rights and protections that US law and constitution would otherwise give them.
replies(3): >>43544836 #>>43544874 #>>43546989 #
pjc50 ◴[] No.43544874[source]
Guantanamo Bay is the real bipartisan moral stain here. It was set up exactly to cause this kind of situation, for the extralegal punishment of people deemed to be terrorists.

People claim that Obama "couldn't" close it, but I think DOGE have demonstrated with USAID that the President absolutely could have closed it by executive order and simply cutting off the pay of everyone there.

replies(2): >>43544918 #>>43544928 #
1. krapp ◴[] No.43544918[source]
>but I think DOGE have demonstrated with USAID that the President absolutely could have closed it by executive order and simply cutting off the pay of everyone there

You're assuming the system would have been as compliant with Obama as they are with Trump, but I doubt that would have been the case. Congress passed a law to make it illegal for Obama to close Gitmo and simply refused to allow it, but their hands are mysteriously tied WRT Trump and DOGE.

replies(1): >>43549626 #
2. Terr_ ◴[] No.43549626[source]
It was just 10 years ago too... To me, that underscores is how much of the current situation is bad-faith cultism.