←back to thread

The <select> element can now be customized with CSS

(developer.chrome.com)
507 points tosh | 1 comments | 31 Mar 25 09:11 UTC | HN request time: 0.332s | source
Show context
wolframhempel ◴[31 Mar 25 15:14 UTC] No.43535984[source]▶
The fact that I'm disproportionally excited about this probably dates me as an early 2000s web developer. But since selects can do things that you simply cannot recreate in HTML, e.g. have options drop downs that extend outside the viewport boundaries, makes this a really helpful feature.

Now, do autocompletes and tag selectors next...

replies(6): >>43536012 #>>43536059 #>>43536090 #>>43537120 #>>43537585 #>>43539203 #
asddubs ◴[31 Mar 25 15:22 UTC] No.43536090[source]▶
I doubt it'll still be able to do those things. From the article:

>Using base-select loses a number of features and behaviors:

> The <select> doesn't render outside the browser pane.

> It doesn't trigger built-in mobile operating system components.

I have mixed feelings about it. Mobile users, get ready for poorly optimized select elements. On the other hand it reduces the need for javascript for styling forms, which is good

replies(5): >>43536161 #>>43537035 #>>43537996 #>>43539933 #>>43541655 #
immibis ◴[01 Apr 25 00:44 UTC] No.43541655[source]▶
Mobile users are the majority of users by far. Do web designers really make their sites hostile to most of their users? (I suspect the answer is yes)
replies(1): >>43542669 #
1. qiqitori ◴[01 Apr 25 03:53 UTC] No.43542669[source]▶
I think this totally depends on the site in question. Seriously researching something is hell on mobile browsers. As is doing productive stuff. Who wants to work on a tiny screen and no keyboard? On the desktop you can open dozens or hundreds of tabs on a single topic. Therefore I'm not surprised to see that on my site (technical articles) I can see the number of requests from mobile devices is just 17%.

Windows is 52%, Linux (without Android) is 18%, Macintosh is 13%, Android 11%, iOS 6%, Chrome OS 0.5%, others <0.5%. (Android and iOS may include tablets, but the overall traffic from tablets is just a few percent.) (Note that I've excluded crawlers and unknown user agents (bots and crawlers) from these results.)

FWIW, some bots lie about what they are, which typically inflates the Windows results. I have another source of data, I can see what types of devices saw my site in Google results, and it's 69% desktops, 30% mobile, 1% tablets. (I can also see how many clicked, and it's similar numbers.)