←back to thread

A decision to eject from a failing F-35B fighter and the betrayal in its wake

(www.postandcourier.com)
247 points po | 1 comments | 31 Mar 25 04:25 UTC | HN request time: 0.204s | source
Show context
spoonjim ◴[31 Mar 25 05:50 UTC] No.43531541[source]▶
It's not a bad practice to automatically dismiss any pilot who ejects from a plane (other than test pilots) except in cases which are wholly obvious equipment failures. It will ensure that for these planes which cost hundreds of millions of dollars, the pilot doesn't eject unless, yes, they really fucking need to eject.

Will this mean you accidentally fire some great pilots? Yes. But given the cost of these airplanes it is better to spend some more money on training a few more pilots.

replies(9): >>43531579 #>>43531606 #>>43531617 #>>43531640 #>>43531645 #>>43531650 #>>43531737 #>>43531887 #>>43536588 #
computerex ◴[31 Mar 25 06:42 UTC] No.43531887[source]▶
In other words to you human lives are worth less than F-35s.
replies(3): >>43531979 #>>43532678 #>>43542026 #
1. spoonjim ◴[01 Apr 25 01:52 UTC] No.43542026[source]▶
First of all, the F-35's job is to kill people, let's not get overly moralistic here, but of all places, the military is quite explicit about using human lives as expendable resources to achieve military objectives. If the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs is asked to choose between losing 20 enlisted privates in a training accident vs. losing 20 B-2 bombers which one is he going to choose?