←back to thread

302 points cf100clunk | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
jparishy ◴[] No.43536564[source]
I think it's quite cool (disclaimer: I am indeed a dirty Yankees fan)

Hitting is really hard. If you feel up to it, and can find a public batting cage near you that has a fast pitch machine (usually maxes out 75-85mph which is 20+ mph less than your typical MLB fastball), give it a shot. When you hit the ball away from the sweet spot, especially on the parts closer to your hands, it really freaking hurts and throws off subsequent swings.

If the few players who are using this bat tend to hit that spot naturally, it makes a lot of sense to modify the bat to accommodate it, within the rules like they've done here. Hitting is super, super difficult especially today with how far we're pushing pitchers. Love seeing them try to innovate.

Plus, reminder, most of the team isn't using it. Judge clobbered the ball that day with his normal bat. Brewer's pitching is injured, and the starter that day was a Yankee last year and the team is intimately familiar with his game.

replies(13): >>43536733 #>>43537013 #>>43538820 #>>43538935 #>>43539111 #>>43539767 #>>43540222 #>>43540288 #>>43540397 #>>43541756 #>>43541894 #>>43542261 #>>43546096 #
scoofy ◴[] No.43540397[source]
I play golf. I write about golf. I genuinely love golf. Over the last 50 years, we have slowly broken the game of golf by allowing incremental technological advancements -- just like this -- that make it easier to do something that is hard, that is making it easier to hit the sweet spot.

I am sending a grave warning to baseball fans here from the future that you will arrive at by following this road.

Golf used to be a finesse game with moments of power. Now everyone is swinging out of their shoes on every shot, and the strategy of the game has reached Nash equilibrium where you basically want to hit the ball as hard as you can at every opportunity, despite any strategic element on the course.

Professional baseball is always what I point to when I talk about what we've lost. You don't need the most optimized equipment to enjoy the game, in fact, ultimately, you don't even want it. Just use simply, standardized equipment, accept the limitations of that equipment, and enjoy a simple game, where strategy can be used to overcome the limitations of equipment. The best thing that the MLB ever did was reject aluminum bats.

replies(26): >>43540447 #>>43540549 #>>43540582 #>>43540648 #>>43540740 #>>43541012 #>>43541100 #>>43541312 #>>43541369 #>>43541592 #>>43541599 #>>43541683 #>>43541721 #>>43541955 #>>43542112 #>>43542311 #>>43542777 #>>43542802 #>>43543587 #>>43544525 #>>43545491 #>>43545616 #>>43546400 #>>43546419 #>>43550521 #>>43558620 #
eru ◴[] No.43541721[source]
Golf is essentially a single player game that you play against yourself.

If you don't like a particular thing in golf, then don't use that particular thing. And if it destroys the entertainment value, then don't watch that.

This is very similar to how speedruns for video games have multiple categories with different rulesets, and you pick whichever one you like best.

replies(2): >>43541891 #>>43542063 #
scoofy ◴[] No.43541891[source]
>Golf is essentially a single player game that you play against yourself.

With modern golf, yes. This is only because of the advent of television. Match-play used to dominate the game, and is still advocated my many (myself included), which allows direct competition, and introduces risk-reward strategy depending on how the other player plays.

replies(1): >>43541940 #
eru ◴[] No.43541940[source]
Well, even match-play is about as interactive as running a race.

Very different from the direct interaction you have in a game like Baseball.

replies(1): >>43542015 #
1. scoofy ◴[] No.43542015[source]
It's really not. You can absolutely change your strategy based on what the other player is doing.
replies(1): >>43542444 #
2. eru ◴[] No.43542444[source]
Runners tell you the same thing. Or bicyclists.
replies(1): >>43552876 #
3. sk5t ◴[] No.43552876[source]
Are those runners and bicyclists not confused? Taking a risk in golf could save a stroke or cost several; are runners making mistakes like "run harder for a bit but fall into a pond" or "run harder for a bit but exceed limits and take an injury"?