←back to thread

249 points sebastian_z | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.207s | source
Show context
gruez ◴[] No.43538202[source]
No good deed goes unpunished. Don't protect users' privacy, and you get flak from regulators for "not doing enough". Protect users' privacy, and you get flak from regulators because it's "too complex and hurts small companies that rely on advertising revenue". You see similar levels of cynicism directed at Google. When firefox banned third party cookies, it was almost universally welcomed, but when Chrome does it the cynics come out and say how it's actually some sort dastardly ploy to cement their position in the ad market because third party adtech firms are disproportionately harmed.
replies(3): >>43538245 #>>43538658 #>>43538803 #
dinkblam[dead post] ◴[] No.43538803[source]
[flagged]
ohgr ◴[] No.43538936[source]
Indeed. If they really gave a shit they'd be getting Apple to open up their APIs so we can get data out of Reminders and Notes etc without having to resort to necromancy and hacking...

Apple need one of these https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/openspecs/

replies(2): >>43540554 #>>43540619 #
briandear ◴[] No.43540554[source]
As an Apple user, I don’t want third party apps to be able to have access to that data. Apple has earned my trust, but most third party apps have not.

I buy Apple specifically because I want the level of privacy that their platform provides. If third party devs don’t like it, they can ship for Android.

replies(2): >>43541651 #>>43545449 #
1. epolanski ◴[] No.43541651[source]
You know you're free to just not use a feature, application, or deny consent?

Privacy is about making access transparent, not by having customers in tiers.

I swear there's a parallel world with lunatics saying they are glad that only XCode can access their file system and processes and they don't want that Vim, VSC, Emacs or IntelliJ crap.