←back to thread

657 points tantalor | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.229s | source
Show context
magicalhippo ◴[] No.43538715[source]
A couple of YouTubers I watch promoted this and given what I assumed it did, I'm surprised that's all it does.

If it seems to good to be true, it probably is.

replies(4): >>43538952 #>>43539459 #>>43540241 #>>43540665 #
willy_k ◴[] No.43539459[source]
Something that has been making the sponsorship rounds now is Ground News[0] which I have found very useful with just the free tier. But given how many people I have seen sponsored by them, I wonder if there is some catch, especially because I can’t imagine that many people sign up for the paid service. I can’t think of what that catch would be though, they do not have unique access to personal data, and I haven’t seen anything that would indicate that they have any information agenda.

[0] https://ground.news

replies(13): >>43539700 #>>43539913 #>>43539928 #>>43539942 #>>43540062 #>>43540063 #>>43540180 #>>43540254 #>>43540255 #>>43541541 #>>43541747 #>>43545250 #>>43550545 #
ThalesX ◴[] No.43539913[source]
I've built a local (for my country) news aggregator that basically clusters news and summarizes them based on multiple sources and gives me the rundown of the most important things, and things that can be found between conflicting sources. It's mostly a pet project for myself as it doesn't seem to have a lot of stickyness without the clickbait.

I gave the 'product' to friends and some of them told me "oh, you should do it like ground.news where I can see left, center, right". This idea turns me off so much. Why would I care if it's deemed left, center or right by some commitee. Just give me the information that's there in most sources and it's probably be going to be close to some objective overview of the situation.

replies(4): >>43540056 #>>43540080 #>>43540268 #>>43540286 #
chatmasta ◴[] No.43540080[source]
Ground.news also gives the information that is present in only one side, which is just as high signal – if not higher – as showing the overlap IMO. They have a feed for “stories with equal coverage” and “stories covered mostly in left-leaning sources” and “stories covered mostly in right-leaning sources.”
replies(1): >>43540164 #
ThalesX ◴[] No.43540164[source]
I'm seaching for 'equal' on the home page and finding no results, nor for 'feeds'. Could you help me identify those locations? It's always confusing to me when I go to their home page and would appreciate it. I think the equal coverage might be what I'm actually looking for.
replies(1): >>43540276 #
0xCMP ◴[] No.43540276[source]
I think they're referring to https://ground.news/blindspot
replies(1): >>43540368 #
1. chatmasta ◴[] No.43540368[source]
Yes, that’s exactly it (and aptly named).