←back to thread

657 points tantalor | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
magicalhippo ◴[] No.43538715[source]
A couple of YouTubers I watch promoted this and given what I assumed it did, I'm surprised that's all it does.

If it seems to good to be true, it probably is.

replies(4): >>43538952 #>>43539459 #>>43540241 #>>43540665 #
willy_k ◴[] No.43539459[source]
Something that has been making the sponsorship rounds now is Ground News[0] which I have found very useful with just the free tier. But given how many people I have seen sponsored by them, I wonder if there is some catch, especially because I can’t imagine that many people sign up for the paid service. I can’t think of what that catch would be though, they do not have unique access to personal data, and I haven’t seen anything that would indicate that they have any information agenda.

[0] https://ground.news

replies(13): >>43539700 #>>43539913 #>>43539928 #>>43539942 #>>43540062 #>>43540063 #>>43540180 #>>43540254 #>>43540255 #>>43541541 #>>43541747 #>>43545250 #>>43550545 #
1. totallynothoney ◴[] No.43540255[source]
The catch is that the premise of the service is faulty.

Their segmentation of news organizations according to bias, can be obviously be biased itself. That's not a problem necessarily, but the service promotes itself as neutral while it's VC funded. You are part of a demographic that will be propagandized in the future to recoup costs.