←back to thread

406 points ilikepi | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.2s | source
Show context
xattt ◴[] No.43536057[source]
Tangential, but I recently noticed that natamycin, an antifungal agent, is being used in packages of shredded cheese as a preservative.

I was a little taken aback on seeing it, given that antibiotic stewardship has been pushed so much in the last decade.

I realize that natamycin is an antifungal and not an antibiotic, and that mechanisms of developing resistance are likely different between eukaryotes and prokaryotes. However, I’m still somewhat concerned what long-term low-level exposure will mean.

replies(10): >>43536312 #>>43536321 #>>43536380 #>>43537386 #>>43537440 #>>43538204 #>>43538257 #>>43538753 #>>43539620 #>>43539642 #
0_____0 ◴[] No.43536380[source]
Tangent on tangent - in addition to the antifungal there is also anticaking agent (nothing crazy, often some type of flour) that noticeably changes the mouthfeel of cheeses that come pre-shredded. If you notice a grainy texture in your food, try grating it off a brick instead!
replies(5): >>43536525 #>>43536566 #>>43536574 #>>43536646 #>>43537446 #
wahnfrieden ◴[] No.43536646[source]
it's wood pulp. sawdust derivative. aka cellulose.

don't buy pre-shredded cheese unless you like replacing up to 10% of your cheese with essentially sawdust at a premium.

https://www.eater.com/2016/3/3/11153876/cheese-wood-pulp-cel...

replies(4): >>43536789 #>>43536883 #>>43538282 #>>43539159 #
happyopossum ◴[] No.43536789[source]
A) Sometimes it's cellulose - corn starch and other anti-caking agents are also used

B) it's legally limited to 4%, not 10%

replies(1): >>43536877 #
wahnfrieden ◴[] No.43536877[source]
That's fine to say it is so on paper however the legal limit is not respected with several common household brands testing at 8-9% in last results I can find. They're incentivized to pad the product with anti caking agents to reduce cost, and it is essentially unenforced. Expect this to worsen as FDA is undergoing planned dismantlement.
replies(2): >>43537737 #>>43539240 #
1. whyenot ◴[] No.43539240[source]
Please provide a link to back this up. The Eater.com article you linked to elsewhere is from 2016 and refers to a specific enforcement action where a company plead guilty to food adulteration for adding excessive cellulose to parmesan cheese. Not a great example of something being "essentially unenforced."