←back to thread

James Webb Space Telescope reveals that most galaxies rotate clockwise

(www.smithsonianmag.com)
352 points instagraham | 1 comments | 31 Mar 25 10:31 UTC | HN request time: 0.299s | source
Show context
keyle ◴[31 Mar 25 10:59 UTC] No.43533500[source]▶
Potentially a very dumb question, but seeing the difference between cyclones and hurricane on earth (clock-wise, anti-clock-wise)...

Does it mean that we are, potentially, on one of two poles(?) of the observable universe, if we're observing most galaxies around us rotating a certain way?

replies(14): >>43533840 #>>43533853 #>>43533969 #>>43533992 #>>43534000 #>>43534001 #>>43534401 #>>43534594 #>>43535729 #>>43537965 #>>43538321 #>>43539059 #>>43539378 #>>43539557 #
tiffanyh ◴[31 Mar 25 12:07 UTC] No.43534000[source]▶
My own dumb question …

How does cyclones/hurricanes relate to being “on one of two ‘poles’”?

Do you mean hemisphere?

replies(1): >>43534491 #
jeffdn ◴[31 Mar 25 12:55 UTC] No.43534491[source]▶
If all of the galaxies we see rotate the same way, are we “looking down” from a pole and seeing only those with the same rotation we have, as opposed to a more equatorial view that would be evenly split.
replies(1): >>43535156 #
vlovich123 ◴[31 Mar 25 13:59 UTC] No.43535156[source]▶
But the universe isn’t spherical. I’m not sure I understand this hypothesis as explained.
replies(3): >>43535326 #>>43535422 #>>43535431 #
Contax ◴[31 Mar 25 14:24 UTC] No.43535422[source]▶
This along blows my mind: I picture this bin bang and everything expanding from that point and... that everything is now a sphere. In my mind. But it isn't? Yes, I know next to nothing but love thinking about all of this.
replies(2): >>43536092 #>>43539578 #
jon_richards ◴[31 Mar 25 15:23 UTC] No.43536092[source]▶
Picture an infinitely long piece of elastic. Now stretch that elastic.
replies(2): >>43536662 #>>43539157 #
1. stouset ◴[31 Mar 25 19:56 UTC] No.43539157[source]▶
OOMkilled