←back to thread

249 points sebastian_z | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.598s | source
Show context
woah ◴[] No.43537884[source]
If the EU isn't fining someone for tracking users too much, they're fining them for not tracking users enough.
replies(3): >>43538090 #>>43538381 #>>43540630 #
1. danieldk ◴[] No.43538090[source]
That's not what is going on here, right? The complaint is that the consent process is much harder for third-party apps than Apple apps and Apple cannot give itself advantages because Apple is a gatekeeper w.r.t iOS.

A simple yes-no for third-party applications makes it easier for the user to reject tracking and doesn't make the process more cluttered than for Apple apps.

replies(1): >>43540215 #
2. pertymcpert ◴[] No.43540215[source]
Where did you get that part from?

> Third-party publishers "cannot rely on the ATT framework to comply with their legal obligations," so they "must continue to use their own consent collection solution," the French agency said. "The result is that multiple consent pop-ups are displayed, making the use of third-party applications in the iOS environment excessively complex."

It's not harder at all. France are just mad that their small advertisers have to ask for permission again which is their own choice.

replies(1): >>43545497 #
3. johnnyanmac ◴[] No.43545497[source]
The part where you said

>Third-party publishers "cannot rely on the ATT framework to comply with their legal obligation

Yeah, as apple loves to do, rules for thee but not for me.

>France are just mad that their small advertisers have to ask for permission again

Because Apple's isn't good enough, but in apple fashion you must use it (but they dont). Yeah, anti-competitive.