(tosdr.org)

298 points ColinWright | 1 comments | 31 Mar 25 09:54 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source

Show context

amelius ◴[31 Mar 25 16:51 UTC] No.43537107[source]▶

We need browsers where the _user_ can specify their legal terms in the response headers. Let's make this two-sided.

skybrian ◴[31 Mar 25 17:59 UTC] No.43537823[source]▶

In a negotiation, either side can walk away. If the website can’t refuse then it’s not really a negotiation. So how would that work? If you set certain headers, the website blocks you? It doesn’t seem like that would be a popular feature.

It would make more sense as filtering criteria for a search engine.

replies(1): >>43537903 #

1. amelius ◴[31 Mar 25 18:06 UTC] No.43537903[source]▶

>>43537823 #

Well, we could have organisations like the EFF compose a set of consumer-friendly clauses, which the user can then choose from.

If the website wants to block something the EFF deems a good and reasonable protection for the user, then maybe they should indeed block the request.

↑

ToS;DR