←back to thread

267 points giuliomagnifico | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.701s | source
Show context
pmags ◴[] No.43517799[source]
I'm a US scientist and the use of minimalist phone and a laptop is something I'm planning for all my travel.

This is for the simple reason that I have determined, based on a large body of cases that are accumulating at a disturbing rate, that the current US administration considers themselves "above the law". Furthermore, the administration has shown that they are eager to carry out actions that violate due process and freedom of speech against anyone they perceive as opposing their policies/views.

EDIT: I'm happy to document such cases for those who have not been paying attention, but I also encourage those who are doubtful to simply search the many examples that have been posted here on HN (unfortunately, many flagged in an attempt to suppress discussion).

replies(6): >>43517821 #>>43517838 #>>43518113 #>>43518270 #>>43518508 #>>43522930 #
dataflow ◴[] No.43517821[source]
Do you not feel unsafe sharing this publicly?
replies(2): >>43517884 #>>43518331 #
whatshisface ◴[] No.43517884[source]
That is not really relevant, because you sort of have to say what's true whatever happens to you, as required at the intersection of the duties of a scientist, of a citizen of a republic, and even on the basis of the basic tenants of the country's majority religion. In some sense to live a steady life you have to be resigned to potential misfortunes, even if you do not want them to happen to you.
replies(2): >>43518006 #>>43518059 #
roxolotl ◴[] No.43518006[source]
I’ve been struggling with this. I’ve recently started using a new handle as a way to distance myself a bit. I wouldn’t expect it to hold up under scrutiny though. And then I wonder about the moral obligation to say what is right. So is it worth, or even morally right, to create a new pseudoanoynomous identity?
replies(3): >>43518138 #>>43518171 #>>43518219 #
stevenAthompson ◴[] No.43518219[source]
Fifty four percent of American adults read below the equivalent of a sixth-grade level. The situation in America is not some temporary aberration, it is a permanent change in the status quo.

Anti-intellectual populism is the new normal, and any thinking person who values their safety should be weighing anonymity and silence as viable options.

replies(3): >>43518493 #>>43518947 #>>43519438 #
geoduck14 ◴[] No.43519438[source]
>Fifty four percent of American adults read below the equivalent of a sixth-grade level

I have a 4th grade child. When she was in 3rd grade, I realized that a 3rd grade education allows you to function in many different forms. A 3rd grade reading level is more than enough for living in nearly every situation.

I would hope that full grown adults develop other "intellect" skills that help them in life, but as far as reading level - 3rd grade is plenty.

replies(2): >>43521074 #>>43537005 #
1. MrSkelter ◴[] No.43537005[source]
This is a take so misguided it seems like parody.

Reading isn’t just about successfully understanding words. It’s the ability to decipher context, particularly in long texts in which metaphor and subtext are important.

You need look no further than the current crop of VCs and tech leaders who can all clearly barely read. Andreessen, Musk, Zuckerberg all love to point at classic science fiction and modern media while making comments which articulate how completely they have missed the point. When musk says the Cybertruck is “…something Blade Runner would drive” or Andreessen quotes Marinetti as a hero, or Zuckerberg unironically uses “move fast and break things” as a motto it’s clear how little of what they have read they understand.

People today are praising translations of Hitler’s speeches. They do this because they cannot connect the points he’s making to the inevitable outcomes of those attitudes. They lack the ability to see into the text and truly understand it.

That’s why a 3rd grade reading ability is a problem. Zuckerberg and Musk are dropouts. It’s shows.