←back to thread

302 points cf100clunk | 6 comments | | HN request time: 0.939s | source | bottom
1. koolba ◴[] No.43536775[source]
Did it really take 125+ years for someone to realize the bat does not need to evenly taper? This seems like some seriously low lying fruit.
replies(3): >>43536829 #>>43536851 #>>43540112 #
2. abfan1127 ◴[] No.43536829[source]
its less about even taper and more about moving weight/center of mass around. Youth bats have been doing that for quite a while. Camwood bats is a great example of moving weight around. In their case, its a training bat.
replies(1): >>43536837 #
3. koolba ◴[] No.43536837[source]
Can you take it a step further with uneven wood density?

Like growing the tree with part of the branch under compression.

replies(1): >>43536926 #
4. papercrane ◴[] No.43536851[source]
Different bat profiles have been around forever, and many players have their own custom profiles that they like.

I think the key innovation that enabled this new profile is the accuracy and quality of data being collected.

Edit: Here's an article talking about some of the bat tracking technology that MLB has deployed in recent years: https://technology.mlblogs.com/introducing-statcast-2023-hig...

5. sib ◴[] No.43536926{3}[source]
Oh, I like this. Feels like something you'd see in NPB with teams recruiting Bonsai masters to grow bats.
6. daedrdev ◴[] No.43540112[source]
No, different bats have been around forever, Babe Ruth's bats looks like a log compared to modern bats. However shifting the taper based on where a player gets most of their hits based on advanced tracking of their hit location is new.