←back to thread

567 points elvis70 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
metadat ◴[] No.43525239[source]
This looks nice and easy to use.

My hypothesis is today's "modern" OS user interfaces are objectively worse from a usability perspective, obfuscating key functionality behind layers of confusing menus.

It reminds me of these "OS popularity since the 70s" time lapse views:

https://youtube.com/watch?v=cTKhqtll5cQ

The dominance of Windows is crazy, even today, Mac desktops and laptops are comparatively niche

replies(16): >>43525330 #>>43525364 #>>43525525 #>>43525540 #>>43525588 #>>43525908 #>>43525913 #>>43526321 #>>43526344 #>>43526446 #>>43527011 #>>43527132 #>>43527202 #>>43528185 #>>43531771 #>>43536478 #
mananaysiempre ◴[] No.43525525[source]
> This looks nice

These kinds of things almost always give me an uncanny-valley feeling. Here I'm looking at the screenshot and can’t help noticing that the taskbar buttons are too close to the taskbar’s edge, the window titles are too narrow, the folders are too yellow, and so on and so forth. (To its credit, Wine is the one exception that is not susceptible to this, even when configured to use a higher DPI value so the proportions aren’t actually the ones I’m used to.) I’m not so much criticizing the theme’s authors as wondering why this is so universal across the many replicas.

replies(6): >>43525576 #>>43525662 #>>43526734 #>>43528453 #>>43528965 #>>43535412 #
1. zestyping ◴[] No.43535412[source]
Ouch. That screenshot is uncomfortable to look at. The window title bars are painfully narrow, the frame borders have inconsistent thicknesses, the Start menu overlaps the taskbar, the vertical centering of text is wrong.

The answer to your question is that these replicas are of low quality. This one looks like the whole thing was made by someone (or a committee of people) lacking attention to detail.