←back to thread

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs. Claude 3.7 Sonnet: Coding Comparison

(composio.dev)
467 points mraniki | 4 comments | 31 Mar 25 12:09 UTC | HN request time: 0.212s | source
Show context
phkahler ◴[31 Mar 25 13:30 UTC] No.43534852[source]▶
Here is a real coding problem that I might be willing to make a cash-prize contest for. We'd need to nail down some rules. I'd be shocked if any LLM can do this:

https://github.com/solvespace/solvespace/issues/1414

Make a GTK 4 version of Solvespace. We have a single C++ file for each platform - Windows, Mac, and Linux-GTK3. There is also a QT version on an unmerged branch for reference. The GTK3 file is under 2KLOC. You do not need to create a new version, just rewrite the GTK3 Linux version to GTK4. You may either ask it to port what's there or create the new one from scratch.

If you want to do this for free to prove how great the AI is, please document the entire session. Heck make a YouTube video of it. The final test is weather I accept the PR or not - and I WANT this ticket done.

I'm not going to hold my breath.

replies(15): >>43534866 #>>43534869 #>>43535026 #>>43535180 #>>43535208 #>>43535218 #>>43535261 #>>43535424 #>>43535811 #>>43535986 #>>43536115 #>>43536743 #>>43536797 #>>43536869 #>>43542998 #
1. G4E ◴[31 Mar 25 14:04 UTC] No.43535208[source]▶
It's not AI, but I have good news for you though : what you seek already exists !

https://github.com/dune3d/dune3d

replies(2): >>43535498 #>>43535571 #
2. aleph_minus_one ◴[31 Mar 25 14:31 UTC] No.43535498[source]▶
This does not look like a Gtk4 port of Solvespace, but like another independent CAD application that uses Gtk4 for its GUI on GNU/Linux.
3. phkahler ◴[31 Mar 25 14:37 UTC] No.43535571[source]▶
Yes, we are all well aware of Dune3d. I'm a big fan of Lukas K's work. In fact I wish he had done our GTK port first, and then forked Solvespace to use Open Cascade to solve the problems he needed to address. That would have given me this task for free ;-) We are not currently planning to incorporate OCCT but to simply extend and fix the small NURBS kernel that Solvespace already has.
replies(1): >>43538719 #
4. dughnut ◴[31 Mar 25 19:20 UTC] No.43538719[source]▶
Can you comment on the business case here? I think there was a Blender add on that uses Solvespace under the hood to give it CAD-like functionality.

I don’t know any pros using Solvespace by itself, and my own opinion is that CAD is the wrong paradigm for most of the things it’s used for anyway (like highway design).