←back to thread

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs. Claude 3.7 Sonnet: Coding Comparison

(composio.dev)
467 points mraniki | 2 comments | 31 Mar 25 12:09 UTC | HN request time: 0.394s | source
Show context
iammrpayments ◴[31 Mar 25 13:04 UTC] No.43534593[source]▶
Theo video detected = opinion rejected

Also I generally dislike thinking models for coding and prefer faster models, so if you have something easy gemini 2.0 is good

replies(4): >>43534647 #>>43534825 #>>43534867 #>>43539380 #
1. bilekas ◴[31 Mar 25 13:10 UTC] No.43534647[source]▶
Theo has some strange takes for my liking but to flat out reject the opinion isn't the way to go. Thinking models are okay for larger codebases though where some more context is important, this ensures the results are a bit more relevant than say for example Copilot which seems to be really quick at generating some well known algorythms etc.

They're just different tools for different jobs really.

replies(1): >>43535144 #
2. arccy ◴[31 Mar 25 13:58 UTC] No.43535144[source]▶
rejecting an opinion doesn't mean you have to hold the opposite stance, just that their opinion should hold 0 weight.