←back to thread

352 points instagraham | 10 comments | | HN request time: 0.768s | source | bottom
Show context
keyle ◴[] No.43533500[source]
Potentially a very dumb question, but seeing the difference between cyclones and hurricane on earth (clock-wise, anti-clock-wise)...

Does it mean that we are, potentially, on one of two poles(?) of the observable universe, if we're observing most galaxies around us rotating a certain way?

replies(14): >>43533840 #>>43533853 #>>43533969 #>>43533992 #>>43534000 #>>43534001 #>>43534401 #>>43534594 #>>43535729 #>>43537965 #>>43538321 #>>43539059 #>>43539378 #>>43539557 #
fennecfoxy ◴[] No.43533969[source]
That would be super cool to find out! And then it also begs the question, is there something at the center that unites the two poles? If so then what is it!

It would also imply that our whole universe is rotating - the only reason this happens on Earth is because of our planets rotation and the Coriolis effect.

replies(2): >>43534093 #>>43535832 #
thunder-blue-3 ◴[] No.43534093[source]
I've been following this news for the past couple of weeks-- in essence your statement is what they are hypothesizing, and that the "something at the center that unites the two poles" might be that we are within a black hole. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole_cosmology for the curious.
replies(3): >>43534147 #>>43534210 #>>43547479 #
askonomm ◴[] No.43534210[source]
It was my understanding that if two black holes collide, they just form a bigger black hole, but we know there's a black hole in our universe, which then would mean that there's a black hole inside of a black hole that did not merge with the parent black hole, right? Is that something that is considered possible?
replies(2): >>43534378 #>>43534913 #
1. blueflow ◴[] No.43534378[source]
The inner black hole did not come from the outside, it formed inside and if i had to guess, it is stuck in the inside together with all the other matter, unable to interact with the outside of the outer black hole.
replies(1): >>43534431 #
2. askonomm ◴[] No.43534431[source]
Just thinking about this infinite recursion gives me the mental equivalent of a stack overflow.
replies(3): >>43535500 #>>43539242 #>>43542343 #
3. blueflow ◴[] No.43535500[source]
I don't think it is infinite - each universe can only have that mass/energy that fell into the outer black hole in the parent universe. At some level you'll inevitably have black holes with universes that do not have enough mass to form another inner black hole.
replies(2): >>43535798 #>>43537614 #
4. idiotsecant ◴[] No.43535798{3}[source]
How much mass is required to form a black hole in a new universe with perhaps different physical constants? It could be that 'ability to make black holes' is a prerequisite for successful universes in the way way that good genes are a prerequisite for successful organisms. The universes that fail to spawn black holes are 'dead ends' so any life is statistically likely to find itself in a black hole spawning universe.

Maybe there is an 'incentive' for universes to form with physical constants tuned to produce black holes with the available energy in that universe.

replies(1): >>43538892 #
5. soulofmischief ◴[] No.43537614{3}[source]
Unless, although there's no reason to currently believe this, the energy requirements for physics are relative within each black hole, sort of (but not strictly) like how the speed of light is relative for all observers. And we can get a little crazier, and imagine a meta universe that is sort of like a Klein bottle in that it doesn't just recurse all the way down but somehow folds back into itself. Again, no current reason to believe anything like this but it's a mind-boggling to visualize.
6. IngoBlechschmid ◴[] No.43538892{4}[source]
This circle of ideals seems to be known as: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmological_natural_selection
7. jug ◴[] No.43539242[source]
Maybe generating a stack overflow was the true depiction of God!
8. jfengel ◴[] No.43542343[source]
The trick is that bigger black holes are less dense. Supermassive black holes can have the density of water. If the universe is gravitationally closed, it would have the density of... well, just look up at night. (Actually much less than that; you see more stars because you're inside a galaxy.)

The density makes the scale recursion less mysterious.

replies(1): >>43543299 #
9. drusenko ◴[] No.43543299{3}[source]
That’s interesting! When you are referring to density, are you referring to average density within the event horizon? Isn’t most (effectively all) matter concentrated in the singularity? Would love to hear you elaborate on this thought further.
replies(1): >>43545837 #
10. jfengel ◴[] No.43545837{4}[source]
We can't really talk about what's inside a black hole. From outside, it has a volume and a mass, and that's all there is to know.

We can say that any particle inside the horizon is inevitably headed to the center. (That's why we can't say any more: no other information can escape.) That does lead to a problem in that all of the mass would be concentrated at a single point at the center, whose density is division-by-zero.

But I wouldn't put too much weight on that. We already know from quantum mechanics that there isn't really any such thing as a "point". The math is still a problem, but the solution almost certainly lies in that direction.