←back to thread

352 points instagraham | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.481s | source
Show context
snitty ◴[] No.43533476[source]
If we were on the other side of those galaxies, wouldn't they look like they were spinning counter-clockwise? Or are they measuring spin some other way?
replies(4): >>43533493 #>>43533546 #>>43533719 #>>43534072 #
scribu ◴[] No.43533493[source]
The point is that you’d expect a roughly even distribution of clockwise and counterclockwise spins, not all of them to rotate in the same direction.
replies(2): >>43533660 #>>43533674 #
1oooqooq ◴[] No.43533674[source]
why? if you subscribe to big bang then all matter got the same "initial kick". would be easier to assume same spin?
replies(2): >>43534004 #>>43534015 #
1. mnky9800n ◴[] No.43534015[source]
From my understanding, the big bang requires that the proto-universe was in a completely homogenous state that was then pushed out of that equilibrium for some reason. But that reason doesn't require non-zero angular momentum. It only requires that a the proto-universe was homogenous and now the universe isn't. And that is what separates pre and post big bang. I could be wrong, I am not a cosmologist. Would be happy to hear from one though.